Yesterday was Day 3 of the BOM Mid Quad Training Event in Denver. In the morning we heard from two different panels with Val Hastings, Founder and President of Coaching4Clergy as Moderator.
Panel 1: Developing Effective Leaders
- Fred Allen, National Director, Strengthening the Black Church for the 21st Century
- Ted Campbell, Associate Professor of Church History, Perkins School of Theology
- Gail Ford Smith, Director, Center for Clergy Excellence, Texas Annual Conference
Panel 2: The Role of Supervision in Developing Effective Leaders
- Bishop Cynthia Harvey, Louisiana Episcopal Area
- Rev. Dr. Tom Choi, District Superintendent, California-Pacific Annual Conference
- Rev. Dr. Candace Lansberry, District Superintendent, Desert Southwest Annual Conference
In the afternoon we were divided among table groups with a mix of people both geographically and in role (Board Chair, Vice-Chair, DS, etc.). We were given case studies of situations which a Board of Ordained Ministry may face and engage in conversation and reflection about what actions, motivations and next steps. In the evening, we went out to eat as a Great Plains team with one of our Iliff seminary students.
Here are some of my takeaways from the day:
- Many early Methodist leaders would likely have faced significant challenges moving through the process with a Board of Ordained Ministry today.
- Regarding the divide / friction / boundary between cabinet and Board of Ordained Ministry:
- It is common across many annual conferences.
- The Judicial Council decisions around this matter center around fair / due process.
- Agreement around a common goal can significantly dissolve anxiety and build trust
- Systems, processes and strategies are bound by time and place. They are not effective forever.
Yesterday was the first day of the Ideation Experience (http://ideationexperience.leadnet.org). We heard from John Handy, who was formerly a leader at the development division at Mattel toys. Each of the 60 some people here had the chance to give an elevator pitch of our idea and receive some feedback in small groups.
This evening we split up into groups and visited different locations around Dallas for an “Inspiration Tour” Here are some pictures that I took on the trip that I believe have some significance for ministry. What do you make of them?
What do you make of these pictures – either as individual or as a group?
I am loving the room at the Stoneleigh Hotel. Excellent! I am looking forward to tomorrow and further iteration, ideation and innovation
… Okay, okay, enough buzzwords…
I heard one of the best articulations of the nature and structure of the church that I have heard in a long time in this clip from BMW.
Keys to this design and to renewal within the church –
What do you think?
Thanks to Signals v. Noise for the link.
My conversation partner suggested that Resurrection is not innovative in some areas and actually bleeding edge innovative in others. This helped me shift the question from:
The first question is one that focuses more on tactics and implementation of new and different things. It also seems to imply a change from the way that things are currently happening.
The second question is one that focuses on a self-examination of current systems and processes. It also helps with the recognition that it is unlikely that any given congregation will be able and willing to be innovative in every possible area.
I feel that both questions are important.
What do you think? Do you find yourself asking either of these questions? What is your response?