<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #6qumc &#8211; Where is it leading? (4 of 5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on faith, life and ministry...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Conard</title>
		<link>http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Conard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewconard.com/?p=1709#comment-8367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John - The voting is an up or down vote on each individual question, there is not the opportunity to rank an individual&#039;s top six. It is the collective that will narrow it. I believe that the top six vote getters will be the 6.
I am all about casting vision, but am not about to believe that I or even a small number of people could cast an effective vision for the entire denomination. Asking questions seems to me to be a solid intermediate step.
Thanks for your comment and interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; The voting is an up or down vote on each individual question, there is not the opportunity to rank an individual&#8217;s top six. It is the collective that will narrow it. I believe that the top six vote getters will be the 6.<br />
I am all about casting vision, but am not about to believe that I or even a small number of people could cast an effective vision for the entire denomination. Asking questions seems to me to be a solid intermediate step.<br />
Thanks for your comment and interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/#comment-8359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewconard.com/?p=1709#comment-8359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t want to register and read all the Q&#039;s but here&#039;s mine:

The scripture commands us to taste and see that the Lord is good. How are we as a denomination doing that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t want to register and read all the Q&#8217;s but here&#8217;s mine:</p>
<p>The scripture commands us to taste and see that the Lord is good. How are we as a denomination doing that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Livingston</title>
		<link>http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/#comment-8349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Livingston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewconard.com/?p=1709#comment-8349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or you might cut the list in each category down to 15-20 every couple weeks but still let people add more questions as time goes on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you might cut the list in each category down to 15-20 every couple weeks but still let people add more questions as time goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Meunier</title>
		<link>http://andrewconard.com/2009/07/01/6qumc-where-is-it-leading-4-of-5/#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Meunier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewconard.com/?p=1709#comment-8348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew,

This is an intriguing idea and clearly has ignited some passion, but I personally find it a bit daunting to participate.

There are 483 questions submitted right now. That is a lot to read if I want to decide how to vote or to figure out if my question is redundant.

Will there be any kind of winnowing or editing of the list? Or are you planning on take the six highest vote getters and building an agenda around those?

Since the highest vote total right now is about 45 or so, I wonder if your group would not be better served by gathering together (in person or on line) and coming up with your own set of questions through a process of proposal and debate. Maybe what you need to do is &quot;cast a vision&quot; for the denomination rather than take the temperature of it.

Just some thoughts.

I appreciate the effort and leadership of the young clergy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>This is an intriguing idea and clearly has ignited some passion, but I personally find it a bit daunting to participate.</p>
<p>There are 483 questions submitted right now. That is a lot to read if I want to decide how to vote or to figure out if my question is redundant.</p>
<p>Will there be any kind of winnowing or editing of the list? Or are you planning on take the six highest vote getters and building an agenda around those?</p>
<p>Since the highest vote total right now is about 45 or so, I wonder if your group would not be better served by gathering together (in person or on line) and coming up with your own set of questions through a process of proposal and debate. Maybe what you need to do is &#8220;cast a vision&#8221; for the denomination rather than take the temperature of it.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts.</p>
<p>I appreciate the effort and leadership of the young clergy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

